A
Review
Rarely, if ever, have I run across an author that accepts scripture
and science at face value, as equal partners in discovering truth. The author
has no problem in stating that he sees himself as a “cradle Catholic”; more
importantly, at least to this reader, his faith in the Grace of God is his own.
At the same time, the author makes it clear that as a tenured member of the
University of California-Irvine Department of Physics, he is a scientist. He takes his faith seriously; he takes
science seriously.
Too often, these kind of statements are made so that the
speaker can join the discussion, though the statements are made lightly. But as
the reader makes his way through this book, it becomes clear that Dr. Dennin
attempts to make both of these foci key parts of his decision making. Though I
do not agree with all of his conclusions, I do appreciate his attempts to weave
his faith together with his science to make a single coherent world view.
Something most writers find hard to do.
Using a combination of Scripture, Theology, Philosophy, and
Science, the author seeks to discover the “fullness of reality” as God intended
it to be seen – giving a fuller view than would be possible if we relied on one
or the other alone.
I do appreciate the work that Michael Deninn is attempting to
do. I remember the job interview I had at a Midwest Christian College. I was
told up front that I would be fired if I in any way supported creation (note, my
field was Computer Science). The author does not support a seven-day creation
approach, but, at the same time, he has no problem acknowledging God’s presence
and work in the creation event. Early in the book, he quotes an undergraduate
faculty member addressing the Creation story:
That story may be factually false,
but it is a myth. And a myth can convey truths that are more important, more
salient, and more applicable than any fact that you might encounter. That story
is better than factual, it is truthful.
The author accepts scripture at face value, recognizing that
it represents different authors, with differing backgrounds, and written using
different genres. Each of these truths serves as the foundation for good
exegesis – and means that he takes not only his faith seriously, but also the
scriptures.
The reader may not accept all of the conclusions that come
from the author (as I said earlier, this reader does not), but the author and
this book do deserve a careful reading by both the theologian and the believing
scientist.
______________
In the
interest of openness, I should point out that this review is written by an
ordained Protestant pastor who spent 24 years in the college classroom teaching
Computer Science. The review is based on
a free electronic copy of this book provided by the publisher for the purpose
of creating this review. The opinions
expressed are mine alone.